Перейти к основному содержанию

Bouml User Manual

PetrVsevolodovich20 вс, 25.12.2022 - 02:25

File Name:Bouml User Manual.pdf


ENTER SITE »»» DOWNLOAD PDF


CLICK HERE »»» BOOK READER


Size: 2599 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook
Uploaded: 1 May 2019, 23:12
Rating: 4.6/5 from 821 votes.
tatus: AVAILABLE
Last checked: 2 Minutes ago!
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
In order to read or download Bouml User Manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.

✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.
✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers






































































Windows release): Note: if you haveBOUML nor the directory itself ! The different types of views provide different context menus listingTo abort a lineNote that thisFor instance if I delete theTheir menu is modified: you mayIf you do that on a subThe value specified on a upper level is followed while the settingHit ok and open theBy default the formatTo Change the format of a diagram,This may also be done choosing optimal scale in the diagramTo save the current window size and scale toTo get all the elements even the nonTo get all the elements even the nonIn case an exported diagram is notFirst call the project menu (rightCall the Package3 menuTo continue without this limitation, editCall the class menu doing a leftWhen you add the membersEach other tab is link to aIt is not difficult toThis also means thatClose the dialog hitting on ok, ask forThis is also because Idl was not set inObviously theseLike for the attributes and operation theThe role name will produce the name of the member, and weObviously this default definition may beJava and sequence in IDL: IDL union use the class stereotype union as for aEdit E and go inUML 2 the artifacts represent the generated files, sources, object,If the stereotypeO and OE. Ask for the generation a secondNote that the code generatorsThis means that even. Chocolatey brings the concepts of true package management to allow you to version things, manage dependencies and installation order, better inventory management, and other features. Learn how Open Source Chocolatey can support your next project. Self-Service Anywhere allows non-administrators to easily access and manage IT approved software from the office, from home, or anywhere they have an internet connection.Deploy recommended architecture in 2-3 hours.Chocolatey packages encapsulate everything required to manage a particular piece of software into one deployment artifact by wrapping installers, executables, zips, and scripts into a compiled package file. http://megatex-plast.ru/pub/bpt-200-manual.xml


bouml user manual, bouml user manual, bouml user manual pdf, bouml user manual download, bouml user manual free, bouml user manual online.


We'll continue to add to this area so check back often. We offer a simple, pragmatic, and open approach to software management. The packages found in this section of the site are provided, maintained, and moderated by the community. With any edition of Chocolatey (including the free open source edition), you can host your own packages and cache or internalize existing community packages.This helps ensurePoint your upstream to. Packages cache on first access automatically. Make sure your choco clients are using your proxy repository as a source and NOT the default community repository. See source command for more information. If you are integrating, keep in mind enhanced exit codes. More information. See docs at. See docs at. See docs at. Never experience 404 breakages again! Learn more. The screen copies are made with Ksnapshot and sometimes modified by Le Gimp to have burred areas, thanks to the authors for these practical tools. I don't manage any more these versions. In the other cases the code generated by BOUML is usable without any restriction (i.e. no license). I don't manage any more these versions. Software sometimes has false positives.If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the linkDisqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up. It is proposed to use a platform-independent model as the central object of the design. It is developed on the basis of a system core responsible for logical management of the entire system. The proposed approach makes it possible to increase the quality of the software and to guarantee the specification compliance. The proposed method is tested on a real control system of a vessel’s power supply. Petersburg: BKhV-Petersburg, 2010. http://kythuatviet.vn/uploads/userfiles/bpr-6-manual-pdf.xml


Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg, 2002. Petersburg: FGUP “NPO Avrora”, 2003. Polytekhnicheskaya 29, Saint Petersburg, 195251, Russia I. V. Shoshmina Authors I. V. Shoshmina View author publications You can also search for this author in. We recommend that you use DoUML along with source control and save your work frequently. It is still very rough around the edges but much easier to workNow it will offer the possibility to take ownership of that lock andThis will later work for other dialogs too but making dialogsA mini toolbar will appear wherever cursor touches theBy clicking it user has access to recently copied chuncks of text. See changelog.txt for details. (section 1.0b4) Without him, there'd be nothing for us to continue developing. Current (non-free) version of original Bouml that he works on now can be found at:Reload to refresh your session. Reload to refresh your session. Help potential litigants identify related legal problems. Automatically route eligible clients to appropriate providers. Help litigants execute desired legal actions. If users wish to save their inputs or outputs and return at a later time, they must register in a way that enables identification of them in some unique way (although not necessarily in a way that permits actual identification of the person). Comments and Issues: Partner organizations will probably want to use their login methods, so the most efficient approach would be a consistent single sign on model for all of the partner organizations. Achieving this goal could be difficult. It is a classic governance problem. Users may still enter other modules directly if they know how to get there. They may also navigate directly from one module to another module as desired. Comments and Issues: Navigation must work simply and seamlessly regardless of where the user enters the portal and in which order they want to use the various modules. http://www.drupalitalia.org/node/72998


Of course, that determination is not entirely an objective one, so it is more a matter of suggesting available legal strategies when appropriate. The module will prompt for information that enables the portal to determine if it is a legal problem within the scope of the portal, and maps the legal problem to a court case type. Again, there may be several possible case types or causes of action for a particular legal problem, so the module should suggest all alternatives and explain the tradeoffs. If there is not a legal problem, or not one that the portal can respond to, the litigant may still gain value by exercising the solutions module. Comments and Issues: Once correctly mapped to the appropriate court case type, there may be rights in certain cases to full representation by a lawyer. The portal should recognize these instances. Of course, a litigant may still choose to forego a lawyer or may decide to acquire their services through an eligible provider, so they still should not bypass the Assistance module. Some case types like domestic violence may require emergency responses, so the portal should recommend appropriate actions in those cases. Similarly, some case types should be confidential, possibly requiring different data handling and the exclusion of some information to some partners. Perhaps most innovative and also most challenging, the portal should make the appropriate handoff for cases that are out of scope (not legal problems) if possible. If the problem is a genuine legal problem, it should suggest several alternative solutions, some of which involve the formal legal system and some of which do not. In both cases the module should provide appropriate tradeoff information to aid the litigant in making a choice. Comments and Issues: Some non-traditional options may be appropriate in some cases. For example, in some states one option might be a tribal court. http://www.acquaproget.com/images/boulter-camray-quartet-boiler-manual.pdf


Legal problems that appear to track the traditional court process may be open to various types of diversion at various points in the process. The portal should make those options clear, even where the litigant does not have full control over the decision. Policies around data transparency and access must be made clear to all users of the modules in the portal, especially for this module (and the Capacity Assessment module below). If so, the portal will provide a set of possible sources of representation with seamless hand off to the selected resource. If a lawyer is not desired by the litigant, the module will determine the most cost effective form of assistance required and hand off the litigant to that assistance seamlessly. Comments and Issues: All forms of appropriate assistance, if available, should be described. Some may be less mainstream than others. Common forms include legal aid, court help centers, public libraries, law school clinics, bar-sponsored pro bono clinics and services, and public defenders. More controversial and innovative forms may include unbundling of legal services, the creation of non-lawyer legal services roles, and online dispute resolution websites. The portal must also be intelligent enough to recognize which forms of assistance are constrained to only certain case types or problems. The tradeoff information will be used by other modules to recommend solutions and types of assistance. The links between tradeoff preferences and portal recommendations will be reported transparently. Comments and Issues: Describing choices among options with different amounts of due process to litigants in simple and understandable ways when more than one case processing path exists may be challenging. Traditionally, both courts and the bar have been relatively resistant to accommodating litigant preferences, particularly when it entails informational transparency about things like case cost and time to disposition. https://www.carlosfunes.es/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/16274807720a4a---brother-ce-4000-manual-1.pdf


It will also report probabilistic or statistical information on the likely outcomes of each alternative, based on court data. Comments and Issues: Some evidence suggests that most common case types, especially those with many self-represented litigants, often follow only two or three simple case paths, with a very small percentage involving significant case complexity.6 Therefore, courts may be able to provide simple descriptive statistics on what usually happens when each possible path is chosen. Note that the portal does not make any recommendations about which path to take, so there is no issue around the practice of law or giving legal advice. It merely describes what typically happens (win or lose, amounts awarded, etc.). This module is optional because not all jurisdictions may choose to include this capability, some litigants may not want to be assessed, and the ability to validly and appropriately assess such capacity is still not well understood. Comments and Issues: Considerations such as case complexity or levels of hostility should be handled by the Assistance module. Indices of case complexity may be case type specific. Here we are primarily interested in the ability of the litigant to competently understand information and make certain decisions required by the portal. Attempts to do this to date have not been encouraging. It has either proven to be too difficult or too paternalistic to do successfully. Provider may have different capacity for different legal issues and this data element will indicate availability as it relates to particular case types. This quantity will need to be maintained on a regular basis by the Provider's system. (Issue Types will be mapped to standardized lists, such as LSC or NSMI.This message indicates that the user does meet financial eligibility for Provider's services. Based on how eligibility is determined, the Provider systems may place differing levels of confidence in this determination. BANGLENHOSPITAL.COM/UserFiles/File/a-liner-camper-manual.pdf


Declaration: Uml: - UserMayMeetEligibility: bool, multiplicity: 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This message indicates that the user is not eligible for services requiring financial eligibility, however, may be sent to the Provider for other services. Based on how eligibility is determined, the Provider systems may place differing levels of confidence in this determination. Declaration: Uml: - UserEligibilityConfidenceLevel: int, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserEligibilityNotDetermined: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueIdentifiedByUser: bool, multiplicity: 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Based on user description of their issues, the Problem Identification module can determine legal or non-legal issues at hand. (Issue Types will be mapped to existing standardized lists, such as LSC or NSMI. For general non-legal issues, lists such as Open Referral can be used). Declaration: Uml: - IssueIdentifiedBySystem: bool, multiplicity: 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Provider may have different capacity for different legal issues and this data element will indicate availability as it relates to particular case types. This quantity will need to be maintained on a regular basis by the Provider's system. (Issue Types will be mapped to standardized lists, such as LSC or NSMI.Declaration: Uml: - ProviderDescription: string, multiplicity: 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This message indicates that the user has explicitly agreed to share data with the Provider system. Declaration: Uml: - UserAuthorizedDataSharing: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserFullName: string, multiplicity: 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserPrimaryEmailAddress: string, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserEmailAddresIsVerified: bool, multiplicity: 0. {-Variable.fc_1_url-


1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem The determination of prior legal experience can be made through user interaction or session data, where user indirectly demonstrated prior legal experience. Declaration: Uml: - UserHasPriorLegalExperience: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToTransportation: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This will include both self reported assessment and potentially automated skills assessment (computer analytics) of how many errors a litigant makes. Declaration: Uml: - UserIsComputerLiterate: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToComputerAssistance: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined based on user interaction or system assessment. Declaration: Uml: - UserIsDisabled: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserDisabilityIsDocumented: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserIsDisabledVeteran: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserIsUSCitizen: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserIsPermanantResident: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserPermanentResidentNumber: string, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasValidVisa: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined based on user interaction or system assessment. Declaration: Uml: - UserIsUndocumented: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserSpeaksEnglish: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserPrimaryLanguage: LanguageType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToInterpreter: bool, multiplicity: 0. http://www.qookspot.kitchen/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1627480a1cdf28---brother-ce-4000-user-manual.pdf


1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserInterpreterIsFamilyMemberOrFriend: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserMayBeSupportedWithASLOrientedServices: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined through user interaction or session data. Declaration: Uml: - UserHasReadingProficiency: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined through user interaction or session data. Declaration: Uml: - UserHasWritingProficiency: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This determination can be made through user interaction or using session data to identify how the visitor is accessing the portal. Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToComputer: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This determination can be made through user interaction or using session data to identify how the visitor is accessing the portal. Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccesToMobileDevice: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToInternet: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToFacilityWithInternetAndComputer: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToPrinter: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToScannerCamera: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - UserHasAccessToVideoConferencing: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined based on user interaction or system assessment. Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserIsDisabled: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserSpeaksEnglish: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem In version one, this will be a self-assessment. Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserIsComputerLiterate: bool, multiplicity: 0. BANGKOKSOLARPOWER.COM/syner_upload/images/files/a-linear-systems-primer-solution-manual.pdf


1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This determination can be made through user interaction or using session data to identify how the visitor is accessing the portal. Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserHasAccessToMobileDevice: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be determined through user interaction or session data. Values will be limited proficient, well (this assumes the reading of English). Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserHasReadingProficiency: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem The determination of prior legal experience can be made through user interaction or session data, where user indirectly demonstrated prior legal experience. Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserHasPriorLegalExperience: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentThatUserIsHomeboundOrInstitutionalized: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Values should be blind, deaf and other. Declaration: Uml: - AssessmentofTypeDisability: char, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Accepted: This message indicates that the Provider system explicitly accepted the referral. This may be based on manual action taken by the Provider or based on Provider system automation. Rejected: This message indicates that the Provider system rejected the referral. This may be based on manual action taken by the Provider or based on Provider system automation. Declaration: Uml: - ReferralStatus: ReferralStatusType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Proceeded to Litigation With Favorable Judgment: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the referred legal issue(s) have proceeded to litigation, that there was a judgment, and it was favorable. Proceeded to Litigation With Unfavorable Judgment: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the referred legal issue(s) have proceeded to litigation, that there was a judgment, and it was not favorable. Proceeded to Litigation With Settlement: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the referred legal issue(s) have proceeded to litigation, that it was settled prior to judgment being entered. Proceeded to Litigation With Outcome: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the referred legal issue(s) proceeded to litigation and providing a specific outcome. (Outcomes can be structured based on standardized data, such as NCSC's State Reporting Guidelines.) Abandoned Without Litigation: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the user abandoned their legal issue and there was no litigation initiated. Proceeded to Litigation and Abandoned: This is a message from the Provider system indicating that the legal issue proceeded to litigation and was later abandoned by user. Declaration: Uml: - LegalIssueDisposition: LegalIssueDispositionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - LegalIssueOutcome: LegalIssueOutcomeType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - ReferralSystemName: string, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - ReferralSystemURL: uri, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - ReferralSystemUserSpecificURI: uri, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - TimeReferralMade: dateTime, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This unique identification number format should incorporate the User's Unique ID, so users can easily be identified.Declaration: Uml: - UserRoleInLegalIssue: RoleType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - CaseStateJuridiction: JurisdictionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - CaseLocalJurisdiction: JurisdictionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - ClaimAmount: amount, multiplicity: 0. 1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - JudgmentAmount: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - JudgmentSatisfactionRate: decimal, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - PercentOfJudgementAmountPaid: decimal, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueStateJurisdiction: JurisdictionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueLocalJurisdiction: JurisdictionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueClaimAmount: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueResolutionType: IssueResolutionType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IssueResolutionAmount: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem These issues may or may not correspond to legal issues. This input will help the Problem Identification module more accurately identify actual legal or related issues.These issues may or may not correspond to legal issues.This can be based on user interaction or system assessment.Urgency would need to be communicated in terms of levels (i.e., high, medium, low) or score (0 to 10). Declaration: Uml: - UserStatedUrgencyLevel: UrgencyLevelType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Location(s) of Issues should be associated with User Stated Issues. This will help the Problem Identification module determine jurisdiction, available remedies, and identify service providers.Declaration: Uml: - LegalIssueWasIdentified: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem State jurisdiction should be associated with System Determined Issue(s). There may be multiple states with jurisdiction for different legal issues.Local jurisdiction should be associated with System Determined Issue(s). There may be multiple localities with jurisdiction for different legal issues.This message specifies jurisdiction courts with case types. Jurisdiction Case Type should be associated with System Determined Issue(s).We need to discuss if the LP TC should standardize the output of this assessment as a level (high, medium, low) or a score (0 to 10). Declaration: Uml: - SystemDeterminedUrgencyLevel: UrgencyLevelType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem These deadlines may or may not be in lined with the User Stated Urgency Deadline(s). Based on System Determined Issue(s), User Stated Timing of Issue(s), and User Stated Urgency Deadlines, the system can determine important timeframes and deadlines. There may be multiple deadlines for different issues.Declaration: Uml: - UniqueID: id, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - SourceSystemOfRegistration: string, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - TimeCreated: dateTime, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - TimeModified: dateTime, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem There are existing standards such as SAML 2.0 that can be incorporated here. Expense Source should be associated with Expense Types, and there can be multiple Expense Sources for Expense Types.There can be multiple expense types, such as rent, utilities, child support, etc.The criteria, such as age, that is factored into counting dependents is up to the source and receiving systems to calibrate. Declaration: Uml: - NumberOfDependents: int, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This value can be provided by the user or system determined. Declaration: Uml: - NetWorth: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - PublicAssistanceIsReceived: bool, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - PublicAssistanceType: PublicAssistanceType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Income Source should be associated with Income Type and there can be multiple Income Sources for Income Types. There can be multiple income types, such as wages, interest income, alimony, etc.Whether the relevant income amount is net, gross, before or after taxes, etc., is up to the source and receiving systems to calibrate. Declaration: Uml: - IncomeAmount: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - IncomePeriod: PaymentFrequencyType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - PropertyNetValue: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem There can be multiple Outstanding Debts against each Property Type Owned.Property Value should be be associated with Property Type Owned.There can be multiple Property Types and multiple values of each Property Type Owned by the user.UserPrefersInPersonAssistance: This flag indicates that the user prefers in person assistance, but will perform some online tasks. UserPrefersManualOptions: This flag indicates that the user prefers to perform tasks manually rather than on a computer. UserPrefersOnlineAssisitance: This flag indicates that the user prefers online services and tools over in person or telephonic support. UserRequiresHumanTelephonicAssistance: This flag indicates that the user can perform some tasks independently, but will require human assistance due to preferences or disabilities. UserPrefersHumanTelephonicAssistance: This flag indicates that the user prefers human assistance, in person, over the phone, or the web.Declaration: Uml: - AffordablityExpensePreference: int, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This would be a dollar amount. Declaration: Uml: - CostLimitations: amount, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - SystemDetereminedUrgencyType: UrgencyType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem These deadlines may or may not be in lined with the User Stated Urgency Deadline(s).We need to discuss if the LP TC should standardize the output of this assessment as a level (high, medium, low) or a score (0 to 10). Declaration: Uml: - SystemDeterminedUrgencyLevel: UrgencyLevelType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem This can be based on user interaction or system assessment.Urgency would need to be communicated in terms of levels (i.e., high, medium, low) or score (0 to 10). Declaration: Uml: - UserStatedUrgencyLevel: UrgencyLevelType, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem If preference for simplicity is high, go to ODR, if preference for simplicity is low, go to court.) Declaration: Uml: - UserPreferenceForSimplerProcess: CapacityAssessment, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - SystemDeterminedRankOrderOfPreference: int, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem Declaration: Uml: - SystemDeterminedScoreOfPreferences: int, multiplicity: 0.1 Stereotype: niem-profile:niem. What does ReadVariableAction operation actually return? The Variable must be one that is defined either by an Activity (see sub clause 15.2) or a StructuredActivityNode (see sub clause 16.11) containing the VariableAction. So by error the 'variable' I allow to choose is an attribute of a class. An other consequence is you cannot define variables for an activity nor structured activity node. And Read Self Action would be greatly appreciated too )) So in addition to what you proposed I would consider introducing export previous version functionality which would report all elements whose semantic has been changed so the manual intervention is required. For example, all these elements could be marked - marks have red color and can be saved. Someone could produce such a model and the model needs to be fixed manually (i.e. Read Self Action has to be added etc) Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Browse other questions tagged uml action or ask your own question.